Kamala Harris Loses Secret Service Detail After Trump Cancels Extension

In a surprising move, former President Donald Trump has canceled Vice President Kamala Harris’s Secret Service detail, which had been extended under an undisclosed order signed by President Joe Biden. The decision has stirred political debate and raised questions about the motivations behind altering long-standing security protocols.

According to sources familiar with the situation, Harris had been granted extended Secret Service protection after leaving office, a practice sometimes approved for high-profile political figures due to ongoing security risks. The extension, however, was reportedly kept confidential by the Biden administration, fueling speculation about the nature of the threats Harris may have faced.

Trump’s decision to revoke the detail has triggered strong reactions across Washington. Supporters argue that extended security privileges should not be indefinite and must be based on transparent assessments of threat levels. Critics, however, say the move was politically motivated and could jeopardize Harris’s safety at a time when public figures remain targets of political hostility.

Security experts warn that rescinding such protection sets a concerning precedent. “Secret Service details are not political favors,” one former agent explained. “They are decisions made based on real security intelligence. Removing that detail without explanation risks undermining public trust in protective measures.”

The Biden administration has not publicly commented on why Harris’s protection was extended or whether Trump had the legal authority to override the order. Analysts suggest that while former presidents retain some influence over security policy, decisions regarding protective details are typically made in consultation with the Department of Homeland Security and the Secret Service itself.

Political reactions have been swift. Democratic lawmakers criticized the move, calling it a reckless decision driven by personal and political animosity. Republicans, meanwhile, defended Trump, saying taxpayer-funded security should be used responsibly and not granted indefinitely without justification.

The controversy highlights the growing polarization over the use of federal resources for former officials. While former presidents traditionally receive lifetime Secret Service protection, vice presidents are only covered for a limited time after leaving office unless special extensions are approved. Harris, as the first woman and woman of color to serve as vice president, has faced heightened security threats throughout her career.

Legal experts say the issue may ultimately be decided in court if questions of authority and jurisdiction remain unresolved. For now, Harris will rely on private security arrangements while the matter is under review.

The episode underscores the tense political climate in Washington, where even matters of personal safety and security have become points of contention. As debates continue, the focus remains on whether Harris’s protection was necessary, and whether Trump’s cancellation will stand or be challenged by legal and security officials.