Indian Founder’s First US Visit Reveals What Americans Do Better
Indian founder shares insights from first US visit, highlighting cultural and work differences between American and Indian professionals.
An Indian startup founder’s first visit to the United States has sparked an honest conversation about work culture, innovation, and execution, after he publicly shared what he believes Americans do better than Indians. His observations, shared during meetings with entrepreneurs, investors, and employees across major U.S. cities, have resonated widely across India’s startup ecosystem.
The founder, who runs a fast-growing technology company in
India, said the visit challenged several assumptions he previously held. While
praising India’s talent pool and adaptability, he noted that American
workplaces excel in clarity of communication, speed of execution, and
long-term planning.
One of the biggest differences he observed was
decision-making. “In the U.S., decisions are faster and more clearly owned,” he
said. Teams tend to define responsibilities early, reducing confusion and
delays. In contrast, Indian teams often rely on layered approvals, which can
slow momentum despite high individual capability.
Another area where Americans stood out, according to the
founder, was respect for time. Meetings started and ended on schedule,
with clear agendas and outcomes. He noted that while Indian professionals often
work longer hours, productivity in the U.S. felt more focused and structured.
“It’s not about working less—it’s about working deliberately,” he explained.
The founder also highlighted how American companies
encourage open disagreement. Employees at all levels felt comfortable
questioning ideas, even those proposed by senior leadership. This culture, he
said, leads to stronger problem-solving and reduces the risk of costly
mistakes. In India, hierarchy can sometimes limit honest feedback, even when
employees have valuable insights.
Risk-taking emerged as another key contrast. American
founders, he observed, are more willing to fail publicly and move on quickly.
Failure is often viewed as experience rather than a stigma. Indian
entrepreneurs, while ambitious, still face cultural pressure to avoid visible
setbacks.
However, the founder was careful to emphasize that this was
not a criticism of India. He praised Indian professionals for their resilience,
technical skill, and ability to operate in complex environments. He also noted
that Indian startups are often more cost-efficient and adaptable than their
U.S. counterparts.
Industry experts say such cross-border observations are
valuable as Indian startups increasingly expand globally. Understanding
cultural differences can help founders build stronger international teams,
attract global investment, and scale sustainably.
The founder concluded that the ideal approach lies somewhere
in between. “If Indian hustle combines with American structure,” he said, “we
can build truly world-class companies.” His reflections have since sparked
discussions across social media, business forums, and founder communities,
highlighting the growing maturity of India’s entrepreneurial ecosystem.
