DOJ Says Epstein Files Review Will Take Weeks After Major Document Influx

U​.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has confirmed that its review of the Jeffrey Epstein-related files could take several weeks after receiving more than one million additional documents, significantly expanding the scope of an already complex investigation. Officials said the newly obtained records must be carefully examined to determine what can be released publicly and what must remain protected under federal law.

According to DOJ officials, the influx of documents includes investigative materials, correspondence, digital records, and previously undisclosed files collected from multiple sources. The department emphasized that the review process is necessary to ensure accuracy, protect victims’ privacy, and comply with court orders and legal standards before any information is made public.

The Epstein case has continued to draw national attention years after the financier’s death in federal custody, with lawmakers, advocacy groups, and the public demanding greater transparency. Pressure on the DOJ intensified following renewed calls for accountability and clarity about individuals connected to Epstein’s network. Officials acknowledged the public interest but stressed that speed cannot come at the expense of legal responsibility.

Legal experts note that reviewing such a massive volume of documents is an intensive process. Each file must be checked for sensitive personal information, sealed testimony, and material related to ongoing or closed investigations. Redactions may also be required to protect victims and witnesses, many of whom were minors at the time of the alleged crimes.

The DOJ said it is using both legal teams and technical specialists to manage the review efficiently. Advanced digital tools are being deployed to organize and cross-reference the records, though officials cautioned that even with technology, the process cannot be rushed. “This is not a simple disclosure exercise,” one official said, pointing to the legal and ethical complexities involved.

Victims’ rights advocates welcomed the DOJ’s confirmation but urged transparency once the review is complete. They stressed that accountability and public trust depend on clear communication about what information can be released and why certain details may remain confidential.

Lawmakers from both parties have also weighed in, with some calling for congressional oversight of the review process. Several have argued that public confidence in the justice system requires a thorough but timely handling of the documents, especially given the long-standing questions surrounding Epstein’s connections and the handling of earlier investigations.

The DOJ did not provide a firm timeline but indicated that updates would be shared as the review progresses. Officials reiterated that the goal is to balance transparency with legal obligations, ensuring that any released information is accurate, lawful, and respectful to victims.

As the review continues, public interest remains high. The outcome could influence future discussions around transparency, accountability, and how high-profile federal investigations are handled in the digital age.