Amitabh Kant Criticizes Supreme Court Over Crackers Ruling Amid Pollution Concerns

In a sharp critique of the Supreme Court’s recent decision allowing the sale and use of firecrackers during the festive season, India’s G20 Sherpa and former NITI Aayog CEO Amitabh Kant expressed deep disappointment, saying the court had chosen “the right to burn crackers over the right to live and breathe.”

Kant’s remarks, shared on social media and echoed by environmental activists, reignited a national debate over air pollution, public health, and the balance between tradition and environmental responsibility. His statement came shortly after the Supreme Court rejected petitions seeking a nationwide ban on firecrackers, citing cultural and religious freedoms.

“Every year, millions of Indians suffer due to dangerously high pollution levels after Diwali. By permitting crackers, we are ignoring the right to clean air,” Kant wrote, emphasizing that the government must prioritize citizens’ health over temporary festivities.

The Supreme Court, however, defended its ruling by stating that only green firecrackers — designed to emit less smoke and pollutants — would be allowed. The bench noted that the aim was to regulate, not prohibit, and directed state governments to ensure strict enforcement against illegal, high-emission firecrackers.

Still, environmental experts argue that even so-called green crackers contribute significantly to deteriorating air quality, especially in urban centers like Delhi, where pollution levels already exceed safe limits. The Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) reported that after every Diwali, particulate matter (PM2.5) levels in northern India spike up to ten times above permissible limits, leading to severe respiratory issues.

Public health specialists have warned that the effects of post-Diwali pollution are particularly dangerous for children, the elderly, and those with pre-existing respiratory illnesses. “Every winter, hospitals see a surge in patients with breathing difficulties right after the festival,” said Dr. Randeep Guleria, former AIIMS director.

Kant’s criticism also drew political reactions. Opposition leaders supported his statement, saying that the government must take stronger action against pollution instead of relying on symbolic measures. Meanwhile, supporters of the ruling defended the Supreme Court’s decision, arguing that religious and cultural practices must be respected within reasonable limits.

On social media, citizens were divided. While some praised the ruling for protecting tradition, others sided with Kant, stressing that celebrating festivals should not come at the cost of public health. Environmental activists urged stricter enforcement of cracker restrictions and better public awareness campaigns promoting eco-friendly celebrations.

As winter approaches and pollution levels continue to rise, the issue remains a pressing concern. Amitabh Kant’s remarks have not only reignited the firecracker debate but also brought the spotlight back on India’s broader environmental challenges. Whether the government takes stronger measures to combat pollution in the coming months remains to be seen.