.jpg)
In a sharp critique of the Supreme Court’s recent decision allowing the sale and use of firecrackers during the festive season, India’s G20 Sherpa and former NITI Aayog CEO Amitabh Kant expressed deep disappointment, saying the court had chosen “the right to burn crackers over the right to live and breathe.”
Kant’s remarks, shared on social media and echoed by
environmental activists, reignited a national debate over air pollution, public
health, and the balance between tradition and environmental responsibility. His
statement came shortly after the Supreme Court rejected petitions seeking a
nationwide ban on firecrackers, citing cultural and religious freedoms.
“Every year, millions of Indians suffer due to dangerously
high pollution levels after Diwali. By permitting crackers, we are ignoring the
right to clean air,” Kant wrote, emphasizing that the government must
prioritize citizens’ health over temporary festivities.
The Supreme Court, however, defended its ruling by stating
that only green firecrackers — designed to emit less smoke and
pollutants — would be allowed. The bench noted that the aim was to regulate,
not prohibit, and directed state governments to ensure strict enforcement
against illegal, high-emission firecrackers.
Still, environmental experts argue that even so-called green
crackers contribute significantly to deteriorating air quality, especially in
urban centers like Delhi, where pollution levels already exceed safe limits.
The Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) reported that after every
Diwali, particulate matter (PM2.5) levels in northern India spike up to ten
times above permissible limits, leading to severe respiratory issues.
Public health specialists have warned that the effects of
post-Diwali pollution are particularly dangerous for children, the elderly, and
those with pre-existing respiratory illnesses. “Every winter, hospitals see a
surge in patients with breathing difficulties right after the festival,” said
Dr. Randeep Guleria, former AIIMS director.
Kant’s criticism also drew political reactions. Opposition
leaders supported his statement, saying that the government must take stronger
action against pollution instead of relying on symbolic measures. Meanwhile,
supporters of the ruling defended the Supreme Court’s decision, arguing that
religious and cultural practices must be respected within reasonable limits.
On social media, citizens were divided. While some praised
the ruling for protecting tradition, others sided with Kant, stressing that
celebrating festivals should not come at the cost of public health.
Environmental activists urged stricter enforcement of cracker restrictions and
better public awareness campaigns promoting eco-friendly celebrations.
As winter approaches and pollution levels continue to rise,
the issue remains a pressing concern. Amitabh Kant’s remarks have not only
reignited the firecracker debate but also brought the spotlight back on India’s
broader environmental challenges. Whether the government takes stronger
measures to combat pollution in the coming months remains to be seen.
.jpg)